AVALIAÇÃO DA VARIABILIDADE DE VARIÁVEIS DE INTERESSE ZOOTÉCNICO PARA COMPARAÇÃO DE MÉDIAS DE TRATAMENTOS APLICADOS A BOVINOS DE CORTE CONFINADOS
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the variability of zootechnical variables of interest for comparison of treatment averages applied to confined beef cattle. The selected variables were: average daily gain, feed conversion, carcass yield, loin eye area, fat thickness, nutrient intake and digestibility. The instability intervals for the coefficients of variation of the variables described above were constructed based on the median (Md) and the pseudo-sigma (PS) of the variable coefficients, considering four ranges of instability: low, medium, high and very high. In this way, the coefficient of variation of performance, consumption and digestibility characteristics were classified as follows: low instability (CV <Md - 1PS), mean instability (Md - 1PS ≤ CV <Md + 1PS) 1PS ≤ CV> Md + 2 PS) and very high instability (CV ≥ Md + 2PS). Thus, the determination of the intervals for the coefficients of variation of the zootechnical variables of interest commonly measured in experiments become extremely important to allow both the selection and the correct application of the several tests of comparison of available averages.
Article Details
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).