A chess rating system that accounts for draws and the advantage of playing as white

Main Article Content

Júlio Sílvio de Sousa Bueno Filho
Danilo Machado Pires
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6821-3748

Abstract

We introduce a chess rating system based on a preference model that includes an explicit parameter for draws, modified to account for the advantage of playing white. Heuristics derived from the conditional maxima of the hierarchical Bayesian model yield straightforward updating formulas. To illustrate the system’s potential for describing past performance and predicting game results, we present the updating process using a small synthetic example and data from a recent tournament featuring elite chess players. The results are discussed and compared with other systems. The proposed system is competitive both in describing past performance and in predicting outcomes. It is flexible and has the potential to be used either as a chess rating system or to evaluate other sports where draws are possible.

Article Details

How to Cite
Bueno Filho, J. S. de S., & Pires, D. (2026). A chess rating system that accounts for draws and the advantage of playing as white. Brazilian Journal of Biometrics, 44(3), e-44894. https://doi.org/10.28951/bjb.v44i3.894
Section
Articles

References

1. Chess.com. Chess Terms https://www.chess.com/terms/elo-rating-chess.

2. Davidson, R. R. On extending the Bradley-Terry model to accommodate ties in paired comparison experiments. Journal of the American Statistical Association 65, 317–328 (1970).

3. Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M. & Rubin, D. B. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 39, 1–22 (1977).

4. Elo, A. E. The rating of chessplayers, past and present (Arco Pub., 1978).

5. Glickman, M. E. Example of the Glicko-2 system. Boston University, 1–6 (2012).

6. Glickman, M. E. The glicko system. Boston University 16, 16–17 (1995).

7. Glickman, M. E.&Doan, T. TheUSCF rating system.URL http://www. glicko. net/ratings/rating. system. pdf (2010).

8. Glickman, M. E. & Jones, A. C. Rating the chess rating system. CHANCE 12, 21–28 (1999).

9. Joe, H. Extended use of paired comparison models, with application to chess rankings. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics 39, 85–93 (1990).

10. Lew, A. K., Matheos, G., Tan Z.-X., T., Ghavamizadeh, M., Gothoskar, N., Russell, S. & Mansinghka, V. K. Smcp3: Sequential monte carlo with probabilistic program proposals in International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (2023), 7061–7088.

11. Marques, R. A. G. On Monte Carlo contributions for real-time probabilistic inference eng. Oslo, 2018.

12. Meng, X.-L. & Rubin, D. B. Maximum likelihood estimation via the ECM algorithm: A general framework. Biometrika 80, 267–278 (1993).

13. Nolan, E. & Scognamillo, V. Online Chess Social Networks (2021).

14. Pires, D. M. & Bueno Filho, J. S. S. CAN ELO RATINGS BE IMPROVED? A CASE STUDY WITH ELITE CHESS PLAYERS. Brazilian Journal of Biometrics 38, 483–505 (2020).

15. Sismanis, Y. How i won the" chess ratings-elo vs the rest of the world" competition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1012.4571 (2010).

16. Sonas, J. Chessmetrics http://www.chessmetrics.com/cm/. 2005.

17. Stephenson, A. & Sonas, J. Playerratings: Dynamic updating methods for player ratings estimation [Computer software manual] 2016.

18. Tata Steel Chess Tournament https://tatasteelchess.com. May 2023.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.