Machine learning approaches for modeling reproductive patterns on count data

Main Article Content

Makina Venkata Lavanya
https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4141-7930
Begary Muniswamy

Abstract

Reproductive patterns define the trends and behaviours related to childbirth, family size, and the timing of births within a group. They are affected by several variables, including social, economic, and cultural, along with biological components, providing them a crucial area of study in demography and health research. Analyzing reproductive patterns offers insights into societal health, family planning requirements, and population dynamics. The total number of children ever born (CEB) is a crucial metric in these patterns, reflecting a woman's lifelong fertility. This study analyses the factors affecting fertility among Andhra Pradesh's reproductive-age women, focusing on the socio-demographic impacts on the number of CEBs using information obtained from the fifth round of the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5). This research applies machine learning techniques to identify key predictors of the number of CEB and compares model performance. Feature selection using the Boruta algorithm identified women’s age, fertility preference, wealth index, marital status, type of cooking fuel, religion, caste, and residence as the most influential variables. Associations between predictors and fertility outcomes were further explored using chi-square tests. The Support Vector Machine emerged as a precise prediction model. The findings provide insights for demographic research and support evidence-based reproductive health policy planning.

Article Details

How to Cite
Lavanya, M. V., & Muniswamy, B. (2026). Machine learning approaches for modeling reproductive patterns on count data. Brazilian Journal of Biometrics, 44(3), e-44973. https://doi.org/10.28951/bjb.v44i3.973
Section
Articles

References

1. Balogun, J. A., Egejuru, N. C., & Idowu, P. A. Comparative analysis of predictive models for the likelihood of infertility in women using supervised machine learning techniques. Computer Reviews Journal, 2(1), 313–330 (2018).

2. Basumatary, K. Fertility pattern and differential in India. ARPHA Preprints, 4, e101097 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e101097

3. Bitew, H. F., Woldeyohannes, S. M., & Yeshambel, T. W. Machine learning approach for predicting under-five mortality determinants in Ethiopia: Evidence from the 2016 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey. Genus, 76, 1–16 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118-020-00093-0

4. Bongaarts, J. A framework for analyzing the proximate determinants of fertility. Population and Development Review, 4(1), 105–132 (1978).

5. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) & ICF. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5), 2019–21: India. Mumbai: IIPS (2021).

6. Koshy, S., & Anuradha, K. A review on AI methods for the prediction of infertility in women. International Journal of Engineering Technology and Management Sciences, 6, 287–296 (2022).

7. Lavanya, M. V., & Muniswamy, B. Exploring reproductive patterns: A Poisson regression study in Andhra Pradesh. African Journal of Biomedical Research, 27(1S), 1181–1190 (2024a). https://doi.org/10.53555/AJBR.v27i1S.1436

8. Lavanya, M. V., & Muniswamy, B. A study on the Hurdle Poisson regression model for reproductive patterns on count data. African Journal of Biological Sciences, 6(4), 1309–1322 (2024b). https://doi.org/10.33472/AFJBS.6.4.2024.1309-1322

9. Liu, X., Chen, Z., & Ji, Y. Construction of the machine learning-based live birth prediction models for the first in vitro fertilization pregnant women. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 23, 476 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05791-7

10. Mfateneza, E., Rutayisire, P. C., Biracyaza, E., Musafiri, S., & Mpabuka, W. G. Application of machine learning methods for predicting infant mortality in Rwanda: Analysis of Rwanda Demographic Health Survey 2014–15 dataset. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 22, 388 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04759-0

11. Muniswamy, B., & Lavanya, M. V. Zero-truncated Poisson regression model for reproductive patterns on count data. Reliability: Theory & Applications, 1(82), 1070–1088 (2025). https://doi.org/10.24412/1932-2321-2025-182-1070-1088

12. Raef, B., & Ferdousi, R. A review of machine learning approaches in assisted reproductive technologies. Acta Informatica Medica, 27(3), 205–210 (2019). https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2019.27.205-210

13. Rahman, A., Hossain, Z., Kabir, E., & Rois, R. Machine learning algorithm for analyzing infant mortality in Bangladesh. In International Conference on Health Information Science, 205–219 (2021). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72751-2_17

14. Ram, B. Fertility decline and family change in India: A demographic perspective. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 43(1), 11–40 (2012).

15. Ranjini, K., Suruliandi, A., & Raja, S. P. Machine learning techniques for assisted reproductive technology: A review. Journal of Circuits, Systems and Computers, 29(11), 2030010 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218126620300106

16. Sobotka, T., Skirbekk, V., & Philipov, D. Economic recession and fertility in the developed world. Population and Development Review, 37(2), 267–306 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00411.x

17. Uddin, M. J., Kabir, A., & Naznin, S. Machine learning approaches for prediction of fertility determinants in Bangladesh: Evidence from the BDHS 2017–18 data. Research Square (2024). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3934391/v1

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.