Reliability characteristics analysis of Ready-Mix Cement plant under classical and bayesian inferential framework: A Comparative Analysis

Conteúdo do artigo principal

Ravi Chaudhary
https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4007-979X
Monika Saini
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1023-0144
Ashish Kumar
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9749-9140
Kapil Kumar
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8405-3921

Resumo

This study introduces a novel stochastic model for assessing the reliability characteristics of a Ready-Mix Cement (RMC) plant. The model employs both classical and Bayesian statistical frameworks. The RMC plant comprises five key components: the rolling belt unit, cement & fly ash storage unit, mixing drum unit, controller unit, and all electric component and motors units. Weibull distribution has been used to simulate failure and repair timeframes, and all time-dependent random variables are treated as statistically independent which allows to assess mean time to system failure, steady-state availability, and busy period. Different scale parameters for each component and a common shape parameter have been used in the model. The investigation is facilitated by the semi-Markov approach and the regeneration point technique, presuming a fully functional repair facility for routine maintenance and repairs. Electronic components and motor have provisions for inspection, but the system is assumed to include provisions for preventative maintenance. Expert repair services are presumed to be instantly available due to component wear and tears and non-repairable electrical elements. To highlight the model's significance, a Monte Carlo simulation study is conducted, offering a comparative analysis of mean time to system failure (MTSF), availability, and profit functions across traditional, classical, and Bayesian approaches. The results emphasize the effectiveness of the proposed model in optimizing reliability assessments for RMC plants.

Detalhes do artigo

Como Citar
Chaudhary, R., Saini, M. ., Kumar, A., & Kumar, K. (2025). Reliability characteristics analysis of Ready-Mix Cement plant under classical and bayesian inferential framework: A Comparative Analysis. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE BIOMETRIA, 43(3), e-43790. https://doi.org/10.28951/bjb.v43i3.790
Seção
Articles
Biografia do Autor

Ravi Chaudhary, Universidade de Manipal

Department of Mathematics & Statistics Manipal University Jaipur, Jaipur-303007, India

Monika Saini, Universidade de Manipal

Department of Mathematics & Statistics Manipal University Jaipur, Jaipur-303007, India

Kapil Kumar, Universidade Chadhary Charan Singh

Department of Statistics, Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut

Referências

Chaturvedi A., Pati M., & Tomer S. K. Robust Bayesian analysis of Weibull failure model. Metron, 72(1), 77–95 (2014). DOI: 10.1007/s40300-013-0027-7

Chien Y. H., Ke J. C., & Lee S. L. Asymptotic confidence limits for performance measures of a repairable system with imperfect service station. Communications in Statistics—Simulation and Computation, 35(3), 813–830 (2006). doi: 10.1080/03610910600716563.

Chopra G., & Ram M. Stochastic analysis of two non-identical unit parallel system incorporating waiting time. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 34(6) (2017). doi: 10.1108/IJQRM-06-2016-007.

Coit D. W. Cold-standby redundancy optimization for non-repairable systems. Iie Transactions, 33(6), 471–478 (2001). doi: 10.1080/07408170108936846

Dey S., Alzaatreh A., Zhang C., & Kumar D. A new extension of generalized exponential distribution with application to Ozone data. Ozone: Science & Engineering, 39(4), 273–285 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/01919512.2017.1308817

Dhillon B. S., & Anuda O. C. Common cause failure analysis of a non-identical unit parallel system with arbitrarily distributed repair times. Microelectronics Reliability, 33(1), 87–103 (1993a). doi: 10.1016/00262714(93)90048-4

Dongliang Y., Fang L., & Tong C. Analysis of parallel system reliability model with two dissimilar units based on phase-type distribution. In 2016 Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC), 2290–2295 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/CCDC.2016.7531367

Gupta P. K., & Singh A. K. Classical and Bayesian estimation of Weibull distribution in presence of outliers. Cogent Mathematics, 4, 1300975 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311835.2017.1300975

Gupta R., Kumar P., & Gupta A. Cost benefit analysis of a two dissimilar unit cold standby system with Weibull failure and repair laws. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 4(4), 327–334 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-012-0091-z

Hsu Y. L., Lee S. L., & Ke J. C. A repairable system with imperfect coverage and reboot: Bayesian and asymptotic estimation. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 79(7), 2227–2239 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2008.12.018

Khalili A., Ismail M and Ruzman M. Planned preventive maintenance effects on overall equipment effectiveness: a case study in Malaysian industry. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 38, 332-360 (2023). https://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJPQM.2023.129614

Kishan R., & Jain D. Classical and Bayesian analysis of reliability characteristics of a two-unit parallel system with Weibull failure and repair laws. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 5(3), 252–261 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-013-0154-9

Kumar A., Barak M. S., & Devi K. (2016). Performance analysis of a redundant system with Weibull failure and repair laws. Investigación Operacional, 37(3), 247–257 (2016). https://revistas.uh.cu/invoperacional/article/view/4450

Kumar A., Devi K., & Saini M. Stochastic Modeling and Profit Evaluation of a Redundant System with Priority Subject to Weibull Densities for Failure and Repair. In International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for Intelligent Systems, Springer, 11-20 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7078-0_2

Kumar A., Saini M., & Devi K. Analysis of a redundant system with priority and Weibull distribution for failure and repair. Cogent Mathematics, 3(1), 1135721 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311835.2015.1135721

Kumar A., Saini M., & Devi K. Stochastic modeling of non-identical redundant systems with priority, preventive maintenance, and Weibull failure and repair distributions. Life Cycle Reliability and Safety Engineering, 7(2), 61–70 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41872-018-0040-1

Kumar K., & Kumar I. Estimation in inverse Weibull distribution based on randomly censored data. Statistica, 79(1), 47–74 (2019). https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1973-2201/8414

Kumar R., & Kadyan M. S. Performance analysis and maintenance planning of evaporation system in the sugar industry by using supplementary variable technique. Journal of Industrial Integration and Management, 3(01), 1850004 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424862218500045

Kumar R., & Kadyan M. S. Improving industrial systems reliability—An application in sugar industry. Journal of Industrial Integration and Management, 4 (4), (2019). 195001. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424862219500118

Kumar R., Sharma A. K., & Tewari P. C. Effect of various pump hot-cold redundancy on availability of thermal power plant subsystems. International Journal of Intelligent Enterprise, 2(4), 311–324 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIE.2014.069073

Liu Y., Li X., & Du Z. Reliability analysis of a random fuzzy repairable parallel system with two non-identical components. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy ystems, 27(6), (2014). 2775–2784. DOI: 10.3233/IFS-141212

Masters, B. N., Lewis, T. O., & Kolarik, W. J. A confidence interval for the availability ratio for systems with Weibull operating time and lognormal repair time. Microelectronics Reliability, 32 (1–2), 89–99 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/0026-2714(92)90089-4

Patawa R., Pundir P.S., Sigh A.K. et al. Some inferences on reliability measures of two-non-identical units cold standby system waiting for repair. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag (2021). doi: 10.1007/s13198-021-01188-7.

Pundir P. S., Patawa R., & Gupta P. K. Stochastic outlook of two non-identical unit parallel system with priority in repair. Cogent Mathematics & Statistics, 5(1), 1467208 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/25742558.2018.1467208

Pundir P. S., Patawa R., & Gupta P. K. Analysis of Two Non-Identical Unit Cold Standby System in Presence of Prior Information. American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences, 1–16 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/01966324.2020.1860840

Rathi P., Kumar G., Asjad M., & Soni U. Reliability Improvement of a Multistage Reciprocating Compressor with Redundancies Using Markov Approach. Journal of Industrial Integration and Management, 1–19 (2022). doi: 10.1142/S2424862221500263

Saini M., & Kumar A. Stochastic modeling of a single-unit system operating under different environmental conditions subject to inspection and degradation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section A: Physical Sciences, 90(2), 319–326 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40010-018-0558-7

Semaan N. stochastic productivity analysis of ready-mix concrete batch plant in kfarshima, Lebanon. International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, 5 (1), 7–16 (2016) http://www.ijset.net/journal/830.pdf

Sengar. S., and Ram M. (2022). Reliability and Performance Analysis of a Complex Manufacturing System with Inspection facility using Copula Methodology. Reliability theory and Applications. 17 (4), 71 (2022). https://gnedenko.net/Journal/2022/042022/RTA_4_2022-37.pdf

Singh B., Rathi S., & Kumar S. Inferential statistics on the dynamic system model with time-dependent failure rate. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation., 83(1), 1–24 (2013). doi: 10.1080/00949655.2011.599327.

Skrzypczak I., Kokoszka W., Zieba J., Lesniak A., Bajno D., and Bednarz L. a proposal of a method for ready-mixed concrete quality assessment based on statistical-fuzzy approach. Materials, 13(24), 5674 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13245674.

Yadavalli V. S. S., Bekker A., & Pauw J. Bayesian study of a two-component system with common-cause shock failures. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, 22(01) (2005). 105–119. doi: 10.1142/S0217595905000480.

Artigos Semelhantes

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 > >> 

Você também pode iniciar uma pesquisa avançada por similaridade para este artigo.